PEMIKIRAN KRITIS ELIZABETH BENNET DAN FITZWILLIAM DARCY DALAM PRIDE AND PREJUDICE KARYA JANE AUSTEN [The Critical Thinking of Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26499/ttbng.v6i2.86Keywords:
Critical thinking, discourse, argument, Berfikir kritis, wacana, argumenAbstract
This study discussed about the critical thinking of the main characters, Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy, in the Jane Austen’s novel Pride and Prejudice. This study aimed to identify the characters’ arguments based on the categories of critical thinking of the characters, the kinds of arguments in critical thinking, and to describe the usage of meaning as discourse strategy and the usage of discourse markers in the characters’ argument in Pride and Prejudice. This study used critical thinking theory and discourse analysis in collecting the data acquired by transcribing the texts in Pride and Prejudice. In this study, the researcher used descriptive qualitative method to interpret the analysis data. The results of this study shows that the categories of critical thinking of the main characters in Pride and Prejudice are definitely high, the kinds of arguments in critical thinking used by the main characters are mostly inductive arguments rather than deductive arguments, the usage of meaning is definitely various based on the argument’s topic, and the usage of the discourse markers in the main characters’ argument is definitely different in usage records based on the intention of the main characters’ utterances.Penelitian ini membahas tentang pemikiran kritis dari tokoh utama, Elizabeth Bennet dan Fitzwilliam Darcy, dalam novel Pride and Prejudice karya Jane Austen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi argumen para karakter tersebut, jenis argument dalam berpikir kritis, dan mendeskripsikan penggunaan makna dan penggunaan penanda wacana dalam Pride and Prejudice. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori berpikir kritis dan analisis wacana dalam mengumpulkan data. Sumber data diperoleh dengan mencatat teks-teks dalam Pride and Prejudice. Karena itu, peneliti menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dalam menafsirkan data analisis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kategori berpikir kritis dari tokoh utama dalam Pride and Prejudice sangat tinggi, jenis argumen dalam pemikiran kritis yang digunakan oleh tokoh utama mayoritas merupakan argumen induktif daripada argumen deduktif, penggunaan makna sangat bervariasi berdasarkan topik argumen, dan penggunaan penanda wacana dalam argumen tokoh utama sangat berbeda dalam jumlah penggunaan berdasarkan maksud dari ujaran tokoh utama.References
Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D., & Wodak, R. 2014. The Discourse Studies Reader: Main currents in theory and analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. M. 2011. Critical Thinking - A Student's Introduction(4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bowell, T., & Kemp, G. 2010. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Butterworth, J., & Thwaites, G. 2013. Thinking Skills - Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Flowerdew, J. 2013. Discourse in English Language Education. Oxon: Routledge.
Govier, T. 2010. A Practical Study of Argument (7th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Graham, M. 2011. Jane Austen: A Study of Film Adaptations. Outstanding Honors Theses. Paper 20., 1-35.
Kallet, M. 2014. Think Smarter: Critical Thinking to Improve Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Skills. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Khatib, M., & Alizade, I. 2012. Critical Thinking through Literary and Non-Literary Texts in English Classes. International Journal of Linguistics, 563-580.
Kohzadi, H., Azizmohammadi, F., & Samadi, F. 2014. Is there a relationship between Critical Thinking and Critical Reading of Literary Texts: A Case Study at Arak University (Iran). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Science, 63-76.
Moore, B., & Parker, R. 2012. Critical Thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nasiroh, Alfiyatun. 2016. Pola dan Kadar Ketajaman Argument Paragraf-Paragraf Argumentasi Bagian Pembahasan Artikel Jurnal Terakreditasi Bidang Kelautan Tahun 2015. Skripsi. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. 2009. Critical Thinking - Concepts & Tools.Tamales: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Prentice, N. 2016. Thomas Hardy’s Tragic Vision: Writing Towards Proto-Modernist Modes of Fiction. Bristol: University of the West of England.
Rosdiana, S. 2016. Questioning LGBT Existence in Indonesia: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Discourse Strategies on Live Debate TV One Episode of 'Pernikahan Sejenis'. Semarang: faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University.
Sheber, S. 2010. Intersections and Implications of Feminist and Marxist Critical Theory in Jane Austen: Persuasion, Pride and Prejudice, and Mansfield Park. Honors Projects. Paper 11., 1-44.
Shukri, A. N., & Mukundan, J. 2015. A Review on Developing Critical Thinking Skills through Literary Texts. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 4-9.
Stab, C., & Gurevych, I. 2014. Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 46–56). Doha, Qatar: Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt.
Tung, C.-A., & Chang, S.-Y. 2009. Developing Critical Thinking Through Literature Reading. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 287-317.
Waller, B. N. 2012. Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict (Vol. 6th). New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Wang, X., & Liu, Y. 2011. Analysis of The Feminism in Pride and Prejudice. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, I, 1827-1830.
Zarei, F. 2013. Discourse Markers in English. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 107-117.
Zhao, H. 2014. The Textual Function of Discourse Markers under the Framework of Relevance Theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2105--2113
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Totobuang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
